Terrorist Business

Terrorism is not deadly as common accidents. They are rare, yet the media reports it as if that is something exciting and shocking. I think we must blame the media for creating copy cats.

And any business has a cause and effect. To maximize the profit, the people must work hard to achieve something. If it is about sales, people try to advertise the merchandise and increase the sales. Who will make profits from terrorism? I think we should know what making the "terrorist business" profitable. First, the military industrial complex must make profit in order to fight against the terrorist organizations. New weapons are invented from the funds to fight against terrorism. The companies selling weapons and researchers gain profits. On the other hand, what the terrorists receive? And how come the terrorist organizations seem to have unlimited funding? This is much like the computer virus and anti-virus software. More virus spread, more profits the anti-virus software developer will get.

Who is the terrorists then? I think the terrorists who are supported from the governments get better life and less persecutions. The nice comparison will be the son of Osama Bin Ladin and the detainees' children at the Guantanamo Bay. Omar Bin Ladin, the son of Osama Bin Ladin, lives in Cairo and married with a British woman. He seemed to be the first suspect in a sence of who is responsible for 911 attack.

Omar Osama bin Laden, one of bin Laden's 19 children, said he was speaking out publicly because he wants his father to "find another way" to achieve his political goals.

He told CNN: "I try and say to my father, 'Try to find another way to help or find your goal. This bomb, this weapons, it's not good to use it for anybody'."

But Mr bin Laden, 26, who has a British wife, acknowledged such a hope was very optimistic, adding: "My father doesn't have the power to stop the movement at this moment," he said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1576262/Osama-bin-Ladens-son-asks-find-another-way.html

On the other hand, the family members of the people who are detained to the Guantanamo Bay seem to have less fortune. The children went through the infamous CIA's toture.

At a military tribunal in 2007, the father of a Guantanamo detainee alleged that Pakistani guards had confessed that American interrogators used ants to coerce the children of alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed into revealing their father’s whereabouts.
http://rawstory.com/08/blog/2009/04/17/bush-torture-memos-align-with-account-that-911-suspects-children-were-tortured/

I wonder why Omar Bin Ladin get some ants on his feets to find out the where abouts his father. Wasn't finding Osama Bin Ladin the purpose of Afghanistan and Iraq War?? I know that story was to cover up securing the oil profit for the USA. But, I think it would be nice if everything was done in logical way rather than making up something to cause futher lies.

Currently, who are targeted as terrorists? Activists, the Gun Owners, and others who have a brain to think logically and ethically. To make a profits, terrorist prevention organizations need targets. They might applied "witch hunting" and "old toturing methods" for finding terrorists. If they categorize someone on the black list, they make up a conspiracy against the one. They just make up anything they can think of and try to prove their assumption is correct. There is no need for the correction of their assumptions. When they think the subject suspicious, they report it to somewhere to get funding. By doing so, they get their job. If you are not a terrorist and want to avoid any danger but someone else suspect you so, what can you do? If you have a weak will, you might admit acting to get rid from the neverending investigation. That was how the witch hunting worked. The people thought as witches were tortured to confess themselves as witches. There was no need to prove them innocent. This very same method seems to be used for the terrorist prevention these days. The organized stalking is part of it. They make up something out from their suspicion to keep the subject under some kind of investigation for one's life time. If the shop clarks want something, they can steal the goods and claim the target for the loss. People working on the crime prevention actually act violent these days. I think that is how the "terrorist business" works to make profits for the people engaged in the terrorist prevention business. These are from my experience as the Targeted Individual since I started to be harassed at San Jose State University in 2006.

The ones who actually working for terrorism might be brainwashed cult members like those who did the Tokyo Metoro Chemical Attack by Aum-Sinrikyo. The suicidal bombing women went through the brainwashing of the terrorist organization.

the woman said she was part of a plot in which young women were raped and then sent to her for matronly advice. She said she would try to persuade the victims to become suicide bombers as their only escape from the shame and to reclaim their honor.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29000504/

Another terrorists may be the ones who are thought as terrorists and had nowhere to find their own identities. It is just like how "witch hunting" turns innocent people to become anti-social from the views of the harassers while the harassers do not understand what they are doing. The victims of the suicidal bombing could be just innocent people who lost their identities. I think the on-going organized stalking /COINTELPRO are expecting to cause the target to be something - criminals, mentally ill, terrorists, etc. In such sense, serial killers and other form of individual level criminals may be described for the good excuse for them. But it sounds much like the society got what they paid for. When they put too much pressure on people or even an individual, it might cause conflict or greater tension. That is what we know from the LA Riot and other incidents. If such flustratoin goes wrong and the people engaged in the action lost the sense of ethics, they would just go wild to do anything.

What makes us human is the sense of how to be and behave as a human being. I think such ethical teaching has been lost quite long time ago. Is making profits the only purpose of a business? When I took a business class, I learned the organization must consider the impact and responsibility within the community and the future. That is why industrial wastes are prohibited to dump like other wastes.

I think it is time to make the terrorist business some kind of restriction on what they can do and what is better way to handle. It is easy to say everyone is a suspect of terrorism while the definition of what suspect the one has is burr. If there are more terrorist suspects around, the local enforcements will get better funding. I think this idea is silly because of our current economy. If the anti-terrorism extremist groups take the suspect out from the community and take everything the one owned as the one ran away, it sure make a profit for these group members. But, it won't work in a long run as what they do is against ethics. When I lived in Pavona Apartment on 760 N. 7th St. San Jose, the organized stalkers moved in and continued harassment. About a year before, my care was vandalized and another car got similar damage in the basement parking. It seems such vandalism caused more security on the apartment, yet the people working on the security are part of the organized stalking group. In this system, only the minoritiey or victims get the blame. It seems more the defense funding goes to the terrorism prevention, more suspects are created. It is a matter of how much norma the police get to turn in suspects for their jobs. This is much like the history of COINTELPRO.