Here is the video I created from the new information about my case. I added the evidences about how I was diagnosed in the all three categories for the involuntary patient - danger to self, danger to others, and gravely disabled.
I was just on my way to my class at SJSU. Because of the communication with Dr. English-Lueck and 2 police officers, I was claimed as suicidal possibility. Less than half a hour later, I was claimed as "danger to self" and "danger to others." No body believed me I had no intention to harm myself.
And somehow the psychiatrists at El Camino Hospital did not even believe my story and made up the documents. In the previous postings and the picture in the video, you can see how half of Dr. Peter Newsom and Dr. George S Lau wrote down was false. If the doctors did not know what the actual condition or the circumstance the patient was, how could they do any diagnosis or treatment properly? Psychiatrists are nothing more than witch doctors. They believe something that does not come with facts and drug the patients. If it was only about "suicidal potential," I would be out from the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center easily after the SJSU police brought me there. The psychiatrist there also did not believe me. I had no intention of suicide but was thought so. Tell me who is having delusion and claimed me as suicidal? - Dr. Wiggsy Sivertsen, Dr. Peter Newsom, Dr. George S Lau, Dr. Carorine Cribari, Dr. Robert Burr, Dr. Kent, Dr. Greenfield, Dr. English-Lueck, and who else?
And why I had a group couseling (relaxation technique) at 8PM on October 22nd, 2006? It was Sunday but the nurse held the session. There are so many other issues to explain about how much things went wrong. like the SJSU student nurse interns talking about I was raped by anthropologists. More of my memory have been proven by the documents from the hospital. Now, I wanna know if that Mary something lived in the room 108? was a CIA/cultural anthropologist expert in Chinese culture. She is a tall Hispanic-looking woman with short hair and talkes English, Spanish, and Mandarin.
Miyoko:
ReplyDeleteFrom my point of view, english speaking countries like New Zeland and Ireland, are not a good idea. They both, together with Canada, US, Australia and Great Britain,belong to the Echelon Network (military satellite control). So in all these 5 countries, gangstalking is very intense, no matter if the common crime rates are low.
Remember gangstalking networks are developed by conservative, religious-type agents. So it has nothing to do with crime rates.
When any European country signs as a new member of the NATO, it is obliged to accept several secret protocols related with clandestine warfare. There is a Coordination Committe for Unothodox, clandestine warefare in the Head of European NATO Command (Brussels). All NATO countries are binded to accept clandestine warefare operations and training, and here is where gangstalking is covertly and unofficially certified by all its secret services.
Leopoldo
Dear Miyoko:
ReplyDeleteAs you know, although misteriously you dont want to speak about it, the NATO's clandestine warfare activities, including gangstalking, are coordinated from the ACC (Allied Clandestine Committee), within SHAPE (Supreme Headquaters Allied Power Europe) in Brussels.
This clandestine activities used to focus on two purposes, the first one being historically the possibility of Europe being invaded by communist Russia (this is not a problem anymore).But the second purpose is the preparation for an emergency situation,and this is more difficult to understand and remains the subject of ongoing research. As this second purpose clearly did not relate to a foreign invasion, the emergency situation referred to is likely to have meant all domestic threats, most of which were of a civilian nature. During the Cold War, the national military secret services in the countries of Western Europe differed greatly in what they perceived to be an emergency situation. But there was agreement between the military secret services of the United States and of Western Europe that communist parties, and to some degree also socialist parties, had a real potential to weaken NATO from within and therefore represented a threat to the alliance. If they gained political strength and entered the executive, or, worse still, gained control of defence ministries, an emergency situation would result. The evidence now available suggests that in some countries the secret stay-behind armies linked up with right-wing terrorists and carried out terror attacks that were later wrongly blamed on the political left in order to discredit the communists and prevent them from assuming top executive positions.
Leopoldo Ridruejo Miranda
Miyoko:
ReplyDeleteGeneral de Brigada Valentin Martinez Valero, director of the CIFAS (Spanish military intelligence), is responsible for the links within NATO's SHAPE (Supreme Headquaters Allied Powers Europe), with the irregular warfare coordination committees, (ACC)(Allied Clandestine Committee) and CPC (Clandestine Planning Committee). I think this Mr Gral Valentin Martinez Valero should explain the Spanish people what type of illegal clandestine activities are being organised in this Committees. Does he approve innocent Spanish citizens being black listed and harassed with military psychological warfare? What is he doing to stop this crime? Has he requested this criminal committees to stop immeditelly this irregular activities?
What about Alberto Saiz, the Director of the CNI, Centro Nacional de Inteligencia (Spanish secret services). Mr. Alberto Saiz, do you have a seat also in ACC and CPC? What have you done during these 5 years to stop hundreds of Spanish citizens suffering gangstalking torture? Does the CNI do Gangstalking activities that are planned at these two clandestine NATO Committees? Have you ever informed the Comision Delegada del Gobierno para inteligencia about this? What about the Comision del Congreso para la Defensa?
Leopoldo Ridruejo Miranda