The authority covers the criminal's voice

How often people can hear the true voice from the persons who are thought as committed crimes? When we know someone is a criminal, it is often from the mass media telling the news from the law enforcement.

Law enforcement groups can tell whatever they thought as the motivation or the logic of the crime. I recently watched "72 hours." The decision made by the authority was based on their logic rather than the fact or the truth from the suspect. This is same for some case of mental disease. People can be sent to mental hospitals without having their right to deny what the authority or the person called the police/ambulance claimed.

Often the criminals of the big crime are asked for the psychiatric evaluation. Then the psychiatrists decide the situation. Then their opinions are dropped for the proving their side of the story.

Let's see. I can tell that I never said to be suicidal. Dr. English-Lueck at SJSU concerned such issue and everyone else believed so. Isn't a power abuse by the authority above my position (I was a student) to define what I was? I think there are more crimes going on in the world to give justice to the innocents.

Police interrogation is like the suspect to agree the theory that the detectives created from their delusional mind.
And the psychiatric evaluation is only used to claim someone as mentally ill, no matter what kind of the disease or how the psychiatrist contradicts their report from the actual evidences and other's evaluations.

In this world, everyone is the suspect except the ones working in the law enforcement group. And psychiatrists are the only ones who are sane to evaluate others.
What happens if detectives are to be evaluated by the psychiatrists about their theories of the relationship of the suspect and the crime? They would be evaluated as the stalkers with delusion on the target as potentially dangerous in the society.