There is a popular image of the socialism.
But there is a problem of this picture. It seems a normal 1 on 1 robbery. When the majority of the people are in the poverty level living, only few have the money. Basically, this picture represents the fear of the capitalists worrying about they are robbed by someone else. It robber can be a state official demanding the money from the capitalist for the social welfare to help the citizens. When economy is sore, governments sometimes give the tax reduction to the large companies and the capitalists. Media often reports about it only helping the riches.
Since our society's money system is based on gaining from someone else's loss, the above image can be used with the capitalism also. In such case, the robber is a merchant holding some merchandises. The difference is either robbed or willing to hand out the money in exchange of the merchandises. And the merchant's left hand holds more money than the blue person.
If only 5% of the population owns almost everything in the US, the socialism is much like a revolution by the mass. I am not the supporter of the socialism, but I just wanted mention if more social aids are available, the society does not have to declare itself as a socialist society. More public transports, social aids, public school systems, etc. These are unwelcome by the capitalists because they cannot find the opportunity to make the profits.
There are more people on the streets these days. Is it the problem of the current social system? I think it is only the matter of dysfunctional social administration. If 90% of the people became homeless and decided to rob a capitalist, it is not like how the socialism looks like on the image. It is like over hundreds of people targeting a rich person.
29 January, 2011
The manimpulated image of the socialism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Una persona no viola, tortura y mata a una niña a no ser que este sometido a control mental (casos: Rocio Wannikhoff, Marta del Castillo, Mari Luz Cortes, niñas de Alcasser, etc….mas los que vendran). Es decir el psicopata “natural” no existe. Por supuesto los terroristas suicidas tambien estan bajo control mental, incluidas las viudas negras que se inmolan en Rusia.
Con control mental se puede hacer que una madre mate a su propio hijo.
Pero quiza los casos mas extremos de asesinato por control mental se dan cuando son niños los asesinos :
-James Bulger (2 años) fue torturado y asesinado por dos niños de 10 años en Londres
- Jordan Brown (11 años) asesino de un disparo a la novia embarazada de su padre.
Gracias a las numerosas denuncias de gangstalking que surgieron a principios de los 90, los especialistas han podido constatar la existencia de un “factor externo” que regula subliminalmente el comportamiento y pensamiento de los seres humanos, llevandoles en muchos casos a realizar acciones anti-sociales extremas.
"When the majority of the people are in the poverty level living, only few have the money."
But what causes that poverty? And what creates wealth? And what in nature gives government bureaucrats legitimate authority to take the money I make as a bartender and give it to you? And who says? And why? Why am I not free to keep the money I earn through my labor?
"This picture represents the fear of the capitalists worrying about they are robbed by someone else."
No, actually. I posted that picture because it's a perfect replication of the true nature of socialism, which explicitly and by definition calls for the abolition of private property. What that picture represents is the injustice of government bureaucrats forcibly taking the product of my bartender's wages and giving them to you, without my permission or consent.
Post a Comment